End-of-Line Ancestor: Alice (Oslington?) Bate or Alice (—?—) (Oslington) Bate?
Please refer to Frederick J. Nicholson, "The English Origin of Macuth-1 (or Matthew) Pratt and Edward-1 Bates of Weymouth, Mass.," The American Genealogist (65[1990]:33-43, 89-96). To summarize:
—Macuth Pratt was the son of Thomas Pratt and [—?—] ([—?—]) Pratt.
—Macuth Pratt was the husband of Elizabeth Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the daughter of William and Catherine (Bate) Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the granddaughter of William and Alice (Oslington) Bate.
Verbatim Excerpt from Nicholson:
William-B BATE… married… 20 July 1564 Alice OSLINGTON… Alice may have been a widow at the time of her marriage to William Bate, since in his undated will (proved 23 Sept. 1605), he gave legacies to Jhone and Edward Oslington, who were probably the widow and son of the Thomas Oslington who was buried at Aston Clinton on 1 June 1598. … In either case, the fact that the Oslington legacies appear only in the will of William Bate and not in that of Alice, his widow, suggests that these Oslingtons were collateral relatives of Alice [or William?], rather than her grandchildren. A reasonable (though completely conjectural) hypothesis might be that the Thomas Oslington who was buried on 1 Feb. 1564/5 was Alice's brother (he was buried after her marriage to William Bate, and could not have been her husband).
Please refer to Frederick J. Nicholson, "The English Origin of Macuth-1 (or Matthew) Pratt and Edward-1 Bates of Weymouth, Mass.," The American Genealogist (65[1990]:33-43, 89-96). To summarize:
—Macuth Pratt was the son of Thomas Pratt and [—?—] ([—?—]) Pratt.
—Macuth Pratt was the husband of Elizabeth Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the daughter of William and Catherine (Bate) Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the granddaughter of William and Alice (Oslington) Bate.
Verbatim Excerpt from Nicholson:
William-B BATE… married… 20 July 1564 Alice OSLINGTON… Alice may have been a widow at the time of her marriage to William Bate, since in his undated will (proved 23 Sept. 1605), he gave legacies to Jhone and Edward Oslington, who were probably the widow and son of the Thomas Oslington who was buried at Aston Clinton on 1 June 1598. … In either case, the fact that the Oslington legacies appear only in the will of William Bate and not in that of Alice, his widow, suggests that these Oslingtons were collateral relatives of Alice [or William?], rather than her grandchildren. A reasonable (though completely conjectural) hypothesis might be that the Thomas Oslington who was buried on 1 Feb. 1564/5 was Alice's brother (he was buried after her marriage to William Bate, and could not have been her husband).
End-of-Line Ancestor: Alice (Oslington?) Bate or Alice (—?—) (Oslington) Bate?
Please refer to Frederick J. Nicholson, "The English Origin of Macuth-1 (or Matthew) Pratt and Edward-1 Bates of Weymouth, Mass.," The American Genealogist (65[1990]:33-43, 89-96). To summarize:
—Macuth Pratt was the son of Thomas Pratt and [—?—] ([—?—]) Pratt.
—Macuth Pratt was the husband of Elizabeth Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the daughter of William and Catherine (Bate) Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the granddaughter of William and Alice (Oslington) Bate.
Verbatim Excerpt from Nicholson:
William-B BATE… married… 20 July 1564 Alice OSLINGTON… Alice may have been a widow at the time of her marriage to William Bate, since in his undated will (proved 23 Sept. 1605), he gave legacies to Jhone and Edward Oslington, who were probably the widow and son of the Thomas Oslington who was buried at Aston Clinton on 1 June 1598. … In either case, the fact that the Oslington legacies appear only in the will of William Bate and not in that of Alice, his widow, suggests that these Oslingtons were collateral relatives of Alice [or William?], rather than her grandchildren. A reasonable (though completely conjectural) hypothesis might be that the Thomas Oslington who was buried on 1 Feb. 1564/5 was Alice's brother (he was buried after her marriage to William Bate, and could not have been her husband).
Please refer to Frederick J. Nicholson, "The English Origin of Macuth-1 (or Matthew) Pratt and Edward-1 Bates of Weymouth, Mass.," The American Genealogist (65[1990]:33-43, 89-96). To summarize:
—Macuth Pratt was the son of Thomas Pratt and [—?—] ([—?—]) Pratt.
—Macuth Pratt was the husband of Elizabeth Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the daughter of William and Catherine (Bate) Kingham.
—Elizabeth (Kingham) Pratt was the granddaughter of William and Alice (Oslington) Bate.
Verbatim Excerpt from Nicholson:
William-B BATE… married… 20 July 1564 Alice OSLINGTON… Alice may have been a widow at the time of her marriage to William Bate, since in his undated will (proved 23 Sept. 1605), he gave legacies to Jhone and Edward Oslington, who were probably the widow and son of the Thomas Oslington who was buried at Aston Clinton on 1 June 1598. … In either case, the fact that the Oslington legacies appear only in the will of William Bate and not in that of Alice, his widow, suggests that these Oslingtons were collateral relatives of Alice [or William?], rather than her grandchildren. A reasonable (though completely conjectural) hypothesis might be that the Thomas Oslington who was buried on 1 Feb. 1564/5 was Alice's brother (he was buried after her marriage to William Bate, and could not have been her husband).
Family Members
Advertisement
See more Bate or Oslington? memorials in:
- Find a Grave Bate or Oslington?
Advertisement
