Parents were Lewis Lowery New and Mary Reddick.
NOTE: Several reseachers have date of Birth as 25 Sep 1860. because in the 1880 census it has approx date of birth as 1860, and age was 19 years old. BUT if you calculate by date of death as 1882 dated calculated from age shown on marker: Aged 31 yrs, 10 m, he would be born in 1852. This would mean that Mary Reddick had him when he was 10 years old? and not yet married to Lewis NEW So either the date of death is wrong or the age of death is wrong.
The detail image of his headstone the date of death appears to be 1882.
So many researchers believe the age at death should read 21 year 10 ms.
Year: 1880; Census Place: Jackson, Boone, Indiana; Roll: 267; Family History Film: 1254267; Page: 241A; Enumeration District: 126; Image: 0141.
John H. New 19 ...son of Mary Reddick
(this is not the entire family just John H. New)
NOTE: Several reseachers have date of Birth as 25 Sep 1860. because in the 1880 census it has approx date of birth as 1860, and age was 19 years old. BUT if you calculate by date of death as 1882 dated calculated from age shown on marker: Aged 31 yrs, 10 m, he would be born in 1852. This would mean that Mary Reddick had him when he was 10 years old? and not yet married to Lewis NEW So either the date of death is wrong or the age of death is wrong.
The detail image of his headstone the date of death appears to be 1882.
So many researchers believe the age at death should read 21 year 10 ms.
Year: 1880; Census Place: Jackson, Boone, Indiana; Roll: 267; Family History Film: 1254267; Page: 241A; Enumeration District: 126; Image: 0141.
John H. New 19 ...son of Mary Reddick
(this is not the entire family just John H. New)
Parents were Lewis Lowery New and Mary Reddick.
NOTE: Several reseachers have date of Birth as 25 Sep 1860. because in the 1880 census it has approx date of birth as 1860, and age was 19 years old. BUT if you calculate by date of death as 1882 dated calculated from age shown on marker: Aged 31 yrs, 10 m, he would be born in 1852. This would mean that Mary Reddick had him when he was 10 years old? and not yet married to Lewis NEW So either the date of death is wrong or the age of death is wrong.
The detail image of his headstone the date of death appears to be 1882.
So many researchers believe the age at death should read 21 year 10 ms.
Year: 1880; Census Place: Jackson, Boone, Indiana; Roll: 267; Family History Film: 1254267; Page: 241A; Enumeration District: 126; Image: 0141.
John H. New 19 ...son of Mary Reddick
(this is not the entire family just John H. New)
NOTE: Several reseachers have date of Birth as 25 Sep 1860. because in the 1880 census it has approx date of birth as 1860, and age was 19 years old. BUT if you calculate by date of death as 1882 dated calculated from age shown on marker: Aged 31 yrs, 10 m, he would be born in 1852. This would mean that Mary Reddick had him when he was 10 years old? and not yet married to Lewis NEW So either the date of death is wrong or the age of death is wrong.
The detail image of his headstone the date of death appears to be 1882.
So many researchers believe the age at death should read 21 year 10 ms.
Year: 1880; Census Place: Jackson, Boone, Indiana; Roll: 267; Family History Film: 1254267; Page: 241A; Enumeration District: 126; Image: 0141.
John H. New 19 ...son of Mary Reddick
(this is not the entire family just John H. New)
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
