EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge} married by 1634, Hester ______. There were no children of this marriage.
She married (2) between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6 as his second wife William Ruskew. With her second husband Hester had at least one child, Samuel, b. Hartford 12 March 1647/8. On 5 August 1680 she was named executrix of his will.
(2) Between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6, Hester (_____) Muste, widow of EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge}
If the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the immigrant, then he was still living nearly two years after he had made his will and just a few months before the will was probated. Furthermore, under this assumption, no New England record has been found for the son New England, and the single reference to William Ruscoe Senior should not be taken to imply that the son William was still alive at that time. On the other hand, if the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the son, this is his only appearance in New England records, and we are left to wonder why he was not named in his father's will.
Source: Anderson's Great Migration Study Project
She married (2) between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6 as his second wife William Ruskew. With her second husband Hester had at least one child, Samuel, b. Hartford 12 March 1647/8. On 5 August 1680 she was named executrix of his will.
(2) Between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6, Hester (_____) Muste, widow of EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge}
If the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the immigrant, then he was still living nearly two years after he had made his will and just a few months before the will was probated. Furthermore, under this assumption, no New England record has been found for the son New England, and the single reference to William Ruscoe Senior should not be taken to imply that the son William was still alive at that time. On the other hand, if the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the son, this is his only appearance in New England records, and we are left to wonder why he was not named in his father's will.
Source: Anderson's Great Migration Study Project
EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge} married by 1634, Hester ______. There were no children of this marriage.
She married (2) between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6 as his second wife William Ruskew. With her second husband Hester had at least one child, Samuel, b. Hartford 12 March 1647/8. On 5 August 1680 she was named executrix of his will.
(2) Between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6, Hester (_____) Muste, widow of EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge}
If the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the immigrant, then he was still living nearly two years after he had made his will and just a few months before the will was probated. Furthermore, under this assumption, no New England record has been found for the son New England, and the single reference to William Ruscoe Senior should not be taken to imply that the son William was still alive at that time. On the other hand, if the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the son, this is his only appearance in New England records, and we are left to wonder why he was not named in his father's will.
Source: Anderson's Great Migration Study Project
She married (2) between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6 as his second wife William Ruskew. With her second husband Hester had at least one child, Samuel, b. Hartford 12 March 1647/8. On 5 August 1680 she was named executrix of his will.
(2) Between 5 October 1635 and 24 March 1635/6, Hester (_____) Muste, widow of EDWARD MUSTE {1633, Cambridge}
If the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the immigrant, then he was still living nearly two years after he had made his will and just a few months before the will was probated. Furthermore, under this assumption, no New England record has been found for the son New England, and the single reference to William Ruscoe Senior should not be taken to imply that the son William was still alive at that time. On the other hand, if the William Ruscoe of the 1682 deed was the son, this is his only appearance in New England records, and we are left to wonder why he was not named in his father's will.
Source: Anderson's Great Migration Study Project
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
