This portrait was long thought to be that of William Coddington Sr., and was indeed believed to picture the grandfather when Matthewson was commissioned to copy King's portrait in 1857. In 1913, however, a museum curator named Hamilton Tompkins questioned this assumption. He pointed out several mitigating factors. First, Coddington Sr. died in 1678 and there were no artists in the colonies then capable of producing such a painting. While Coddington had traveled to England in 1651 to obtain the colonial charter for Aquidneck and Conanicut Islands, the subject's ostentatious mode of dress and particularly his wig are completely out of keeping with styles of this early time, especially for a Quaker, the faith professed by Coddington Sr. The same objections can be applied to William Coddington, Jr., who died in 1685. King Charles the 2nd introduced the large "periwig" to the English when he arrived in England in 1660, but the style caught on slowly and would certainly have been shunned by Quakers. Only by 1700 were Rhode Islanders gaining enough wealth and international exposure to dress in such a costume, Tompkins determined. There are several other portraits of important colonial subjects from this later time period that exhibit similar garment and wig styles, such as Peter Faneuil, John Hancock, and John Bannister of Newport.
The artist of the original painting, Nehemiah Partridge (1683 - 1737) was an itinerant portraitist and decorative painter from Portsmouth, New Hampshire. He was the son of Mary Brown and Colonel William Partridge, who later became lieutenant governor of New Hampshire. Partridge advertised in both Boston and New York City as a japanner, paint seller, and a owner of "the Italian Matchean, or moving Picture." No portraits survive from these places, but several discoveries have been made in other towns that led to Partridge's identification, including a copy by Charles Bird King (1785 - 1862).
This portrait was long thought to be that of William Coddington Sr., and was indeed believed to picture the grandfather when Matthewson was commissioned to copy King's portrait in 1857. In 1913, however, a museum curator named Hamilton Tompkins questioned this assumption. He pointed out several mitigating factors. First, Coddington Sr. died in 1678 and there were no artists in the colonies then capable of producing such a painting. While Coddington had traveled to England in 1651 to obtain the colonial charter for Aquidneck and Conanicut Islands, the subject's ostentatious mode of dress and particularly his wig are completely out of keeping with styles of this early time, especially for a Quaker, the faith professed by Coddington Sr. The same objections can be applied to William Coddington, Jr., who died in 1685. King Charles the 2nd introduced the large "periwig" to the English when he arrived in England in 1660, but the style caught on slowly and would certainly have been shunned by Quakers. Only by 1700 were Rhode Islanders gaining enough wealth and international exposure to dress in such a costume, Tompkins determined. There are several other portraits of important colonial subjects from this later time period that exhibit similar garment and wig styles, such as Peter Faneuil, John Hancock, and John Bannister of Newport.
The artist of the original painting, Nehemiah Partridge (1683 - 1737) was an itinerant portraitist and decorative painter from Portsmouth, New Hampshire. He was the son of Mary Brown and Colonel William Partridge, who later became lieutenant governor of New Hampshire. Partridge advertised in both Boston and New York City as a japanner, paint seller, and a owner of "the Italian Matchean, or moving Picture." No portraits survive from these places, but several discoveries have been made in other towns that led to Partridge's identification, including a copy by Charles Bird King (1785 - 1862).
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement