Infant of Henry & M. CHUBB
There is no date on the stone.
The Enders book (page 41, item 480, Enders # 1-2-2-8-2) lists Louisa Chubb as the second child of Daniel [should be Henry P.] Chubb and his wife Margaret Peters, born 8 Jan 1847. Since she is not listed with the family on the 1850 United States Federal Census, it is assumed she was the "Infant Chubb" on this stone. Since she was listed as an infant, it is also assumed she died soon after she was born.
There is no date on the stone.
The Enders book (page 41, item 480, Enders # 1-2-2-8-2) lists Louisa Chubb as the second child of Daniel [should be Henry P.] Chubb and his wife Margaret Peters, born 8 Jan 1847. Since she is not listed with the family on the 1850 United States Federal Census, it is assumed she was the "Infant Chubb" on this stone. Since she was listed as an infant, it is also assumed she died soon after she was born.
Infant of Henry & M. CHUBB
There is no date on the stone.
The Enders book (page 41, item 480, Enders # 1-2-2-8-2) lists Louisa Chubb as the second child of Daniel [should be Henry P.] Chubb and his wife Margaret Peters, born 8 Jan 1847. Since she is not listed with the family on the 1850 United States Federal Census, it is assumed she was the "Infant Chubb" on this stone. Since she was listed as an infant, it is also assumed she died soon after she was born.
There is no date on the stone.
The Enders book (page 41, item 480, Enders # 1-2-2-8-2) lists Louisa Chubb as the second child of Daniel [should be Henry P.] Chubb and his wife Margaret Peters, born 8 Jan 1847. Since she is not listed with the family on the 1850 United States Federal Census, it is assumed she was the "Infant Chubb" on this stone. Since she was listed as an infant, it is also assumed she died soon after she was born.
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
