AE 52, 3 mo. 8 days
John Lickly / Lickley (Jr.) married Mary Cole 20 April 1809.
Their children were:
Martha A. Lickley b: 28 JAN 1810
Mary Lickley b: 25 SEP 1811
William C. Lickley b: 28 MAR 1814
Margaret Lickley
James B. Lickley
Adelia Lickley b: Apr. 8, 1817
John M. Lickley b: 8 MAY 1826
Ebenezer Lickley b: 6 JAN 1830
Infant Child Lickley d: 6 DEC 1831
Sarah Emeline Lickley b: 20 MAR 1834
Some family trees show Ebenezer Lickley as dying 6 December 1831, but it is doubtful that he would be buried as Infant Child Lickley when he was two years old and obviously had a name.
The Lickley infant's tombstone says Infant Child Lickley, 6 Dec 1831, and was apparently born 1831.
Some FindAGrave Contributor apparently suggested that the former manager of the memorial for INFANT CHILD LICKLEY change it to Adelia Lickley Romer, and the manager did so in error.
Adelia Lickley Romer has a separate tombstone in the same cemetery and was born April 8, 1817 -- 14 years before Infant Child was born and died.
These were not two sisters named Adelia, with the older one living until 1884 while the other one died soon after birth, and certainly a child less than a year old did not marry James Romer either.
John Lickly / Lickley (Jr.) married Mary Cole 20 April 1809.
Their children were:
Martha A. Lickley b: 28 JAN 1810
Mary Lickley b: 25 SEP 1811
William C. Lickley b: 28 MAR 1814
Margaret Lickley
James B. Lickley
Adelia Lickley b: Apr. 8, 1817
John M. Lickley b: 8 MAY 1826
Ebenezer Lickley b: 6 JAN 1830
Infant Child Lickley d: 6 DEC 1831
Sarah Emeline Lickley b: 20 MAR 1834
Some family trees show Ebenezer Lickley as dying 6 December 1831, but it is doubtful that he would be buried as Infant Child Lickley when he was two years old and obviously had a name.
The Lickley infant's tombstone says Infant Child Lickley, 6 Dec 1831, and was apparently born 1831.
Some FindAGrave Contributor apparently suggested that the former manager of the memorial for INFANT CHILD LICKLEY change it to Adelia Lickley Romer, and the manager did so in error.
Adelia Lickley Romer has a separate tombstone in the same cemetery and was born April 8, 1817 -- 14 years before Infant Child was born and died.
These were not two sisters named Adelia, with the older one living until 1884 while the other one died soon after birth, and certainly a child less than a year old did not marry James Romer either.
AE 52, 3 mo. 8 days
John Lickly / Lickley (Jr.) married Mary Cole 20 April 1809.
Their children were:
Martha A. Lickley b: 28 JAN 1810
Mary Lickley b: 25 SEP 1811
William C. Lickley b: 28 MAR 1814
Margaret Lickley
James B. Lickley
Adelia Lickley b: Apr. 8, 1817
John M. Lickley b: 8 MAY 1826
Ebenezer Lickley b: 6 JAN 1830
Infant Child Lickley d: 6 DEC 1831
Sarah Emeline Lickley b: 20 MAR 1834
Some family trees show Ebenezer Lickley as dying 6 December 1831, but it is doubtful that he would be buried as Infant Child Lickley when he was two years old and obviously had a name.
The Lickley infant's tombstone says Infant Child Lickley, 6 Dec 1831, and was apparently born 1831.
Some FindAGrave Contributor apparently suggested that the former manager of the memorial for INFANT CHILD LICKLEY change it to Adelia Lickley Romer, and the manager did so in error.
Adelia Lickley Romer has a separate tombstone in the same cemetery and was born April 8, 1817 -- 14 years before Infant Child was born and died.
These were not two sisters named Adelia, with the older one living until 1884 while the other one died soon after birth, and certainly a child less than a year old did not marry James Romer either.
John Lickly / Lickley (Jr.) married Mary Cole 20 April 1809.
Their children were:
Martha A. Lickley b: 28 JAN 1810
Mary Lickley b: 25 SEP 1811
William C. Lickley b: 28 MAR 1814
Margaret Lickley
James B. Lickley
Adelia Lickley b: Apr. 8, 1817
John M. Lickley b: 8 MAY 1826
Ebenezer Lickley b: 6 JAN 1830
Infant Child Lickley d: 6 DEC 1831
Sarah Emeline Lickley b: 20 MAR 1834
Some family trees show Ebenezer Lickley as dying 6 December 1831, but it is doubtful that he would be buried as Infant Child Lickley when he was two years old and obviously had a name.
The Lickley infant's tombstone says Infant Child Lickley, 6 Dec 1831, and was apparently born 1831.
Some FindAGrave Contributor apparently suggested that the former manager of the memorial for INFANT CHILD LICKLEY change it to Adelia Lickley Romer, and the manager did so in error.
Adelia Lickley Romer has a separate tombstone in the same cemetery and was born April 8, 1817 -- 14 years before Infant Child was born and died.
These were not two sisters named Adelia, with the older one living until 1884 while the other one died soon after birth, and certainly a child less than a year old did not marry James Romer either.
Family Members
Siblings
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
