In 1900 she said she had had 5 children but only 4 were still living... Edna,17, Ella,15, Glen, 7 and Mary, 1. She may have had more after that census but if so, they never lived long enough to make it into a census.
Because there is such a long gap between the birth of Ella and Glen, chances are, that's where the missing/deceased child should be.
in 1910, both Mary and Ella are missing, Ella would be 25, so it's likely she's living and married, but Mary would only be 11. She is most likely deceased.
In 1900 she said she had had 5 children but only 4 were still living... Edna,17, Ella,15, Glen, 7 and Mary, 1. She may have had more after that census but if so, they never lived long enough to make it into a census.
Because there is such a long gap between the birth of Ella and Glen, chances are, that's where the missing/deceased child should be.
in 1910, both Mary and Ella are missing, Ella would be 25, so it's likely she's living and married, but Mary would only be 11. She is most likely deceased.
Family Members
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Advertisement